Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Getting My h4831sc load data To Work
Blog Article
I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was developing far more tension and was slower compared to previous stuff. I do not recall if I even tried out common h4831 or not; I am considering not.
I've utilised H4831 (and H4831SC), And that i use it. There usually are not many cartridges that I use it for as I appear to be always to gravitate to other powders. Even so, I can't mention that it would not perform. It is just that some other powders do the job much better for the supplied cartridge. For example, inside the 280, H4831 gave me fantastic velocity and very fantastic groups with Nosler one hundred forty AB. On the other hand, RL19 was marginally much better in precision, nevertheless the velocity was almost equivalent.
That you are proper They may be precisely the same the SC is brief Slice so it meters better, I don't Consider you can obtain just frequent 4831 anymore
Meaning the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, locate a starting load when just one is listed for a specific cartridge.
My knowledge would be that the SC and SSC loaded to the identical weight as being the extended cut exhibits a decreased velocity.
Liberalism; The difficult however acknowledged Idea that it's solely doable to select up a turd from the clear stop.
Nampa, Idaho In my working experience the sole true variation is that the shortcut meters far better as a result of reloading devices. As soon as It is loaded theres no practical variance. I have listened to which the h4831 vs h4831sc shortcut could possibly have a very small little bit more rapidly burn off amount but It appears insignificant.
The SC or SSC designated powders Usually enable for larger load density, so you're able to commonly get a little bit extra powder inside of a supplied scenario when working with compressed loads. Utilization of a drop tube can more boost this benefit.
WA I'd advocate a slower burner that should h4831sc load data give better situation density like H1000 or IMR 7977, particularly if you happen to be loading heavies very long.
You may have to make several much more posts to get cleared to accomplish PM's. As soon as you reach h4831sc that position I might write-up inside the categorised reloading segment to check out if anyone is near you for the trade. Click on to extend...
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are wholly various powders, with IMR 4831 getting considerably speedier than the Hodgdon variants. Never address them as the identical powder, as they most undoubtedly will not be.
The "SC" means Brief Slash. I have not found a difference between possibly powder dut I don't Imagine I'd blend them.
A few of the outdated Lyman data just listed IMR 4831, which was surplus armed forces powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.
The point that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is exactly why you happen to be observing higher velocities obtained with that powder, rather than That which you've found with the IMR stuff.